house tree person drawing analysis

Description

The House-Tree-Person (H-T-P) technique, developed by John Buck (1948) and Emmanuel Hammer (1958), is one of the most widely used projective tests for children and adults. It can be used with individuals aged 3 years and older and is almost entirely unstructured; the client is simply instructed to make a freehand drawing of a house, a tree, and a person. Analysis of the H-T-P is a two-phased, four-step process. In phase one, the first step in testing is nonverbal and almost entirely unstructured; the medium of expression is the freehand, pencil drawings of a house, tree, and person (Buck 1966). The second step is verbal, apperceptive, and more formally structured. In it, the client is given the opportunity to describe, define, and interpret his or her drawn objects and their respective environment, and to respond to various open-ended questions. In phase two, the first step again involves the freehand drawing of a house, tree, and person, but with...

References and Readings

• Arrington, D., & Yorgin, P. D. (2001). Art therapy as a cross-cultural means to assess psychosocial health in homeless and orphaned children in Kiev. Art Therapy: Journal of the American Art Therapy Association, 18, 80–88.

  CrossRef  Google Scholar

• Bennink, J., Gussak, D. E., & Skowran, M. (2003). The role of the art therapist in a juvenile setting. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 30, 163–173.

  CrossRef  Google Scholar

• Blatt, S., & Ford, R. (1994). Therapeutic change. New York: Plenum.

  CrossRef  Google Scholar

• Buck, J. N. (1948). The H-T-P. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 4, 151–159.

  CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar

• Buck, J. N. (1966). The House-Tree-Person technique: Revised manual. Beverly Hills: Western Psychological Services.

  Google Scholar

• Buck, J. N. (1978). A qualitative and quantitative scoring manual. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 4, 397–405.

  Google Scholar

• Buck, J. N., & Hammer, E. F. (Eds.). (1969). Advances in House-Tree-Person techniques: Variations and applications. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.

  Google Scholar

• Burns, R. C. (1987). Kinetic-House-Tree-Person Drawings (K-H-T-P): An Interpretative Manual. Philadelphia: Brunner/Mazel.

  Google Scholar

• Daiki, K., & Mikie, S. (2015). Relationships between human figures drawn by Japanese early adolescents: Applying the Synthetic House-Tree-Person Test. Social Behavior and Personality, 43, 175–176.

  CrossRef  Google Scholar

• Dewaraja, R., Sato, H., & Ogawa, T. (2006). Anxiety in tsunami-affected children in Sri Lanka measured by Revised Children's Manifest Anxiety Scale and Synthetic House-Tree-Person Test. International Congress Series, 1287, 74–78.

  CrossRef  Google Scholar

• Gantt, L. (2004). The case for formal art therapy assessments. Art Therapy: Journal of the American Art Therapy Association, 21, 18–29.

  CrossRef  Google Scholar

• Garb, H. N., Wood, J. M., Lilienfeld, S. O., & Nezworski, M. T. (2002). Effective use of projective techniques in clinical practice: Let the data help with selection and interpretation. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 5, 454–463.

  CrossRef  Google Scholar

• Gauntlett, D., & Holzwarth, P. (2006). Creative and visual methods for exploring identities. Visual Studies, 21, 82–91.

  CrossRef  Google Scholar

• Goodenough, F. L. (1926). Measurement of intelligence by drawings. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.

  Google Scholar

• Groth-Marnat, G., & Roberts, L. (1998). Human Figure Drawings and House Tree Person drawings as indicators of self-esteem: A quantitative approach. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 54, 219–222.

  CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar

• Hammer, E. F. (1958). The clinical application of projective drawings. Springfield: Charles Thomas.

  Google Scholar

• Hammer, E. F. (1971). The clinical application of projective drawings. Springfield: Charles C. Thomas.

  Google Scholar

• Hammer, E. F. (1997). Advances in projective drawing interpretation. Springfield: Charles C. Thomas.

  Google Scholar

• Handler, L. (1996). The clinical issues of figure drawings. In C. S. Newmark (Ed.), Major psychological assessment instruments (2nd ed., pp. 206–293). Allyn & Needham Heights: Bacon.

  Google Scholar

• Handler, L., & Riethmiller, R. J. (1998). Teaching and learning the administration and interpretation of graphic techniques. In H. Handler & M. Hilsenroth (Eds.), Teaching and Learning Personality Assessment (pp. 267–294). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

  Google Scholar

• Harris, D. B. (1963). Children's drawings as measures of intellectual maturity. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.

  Google Scholar

• Jolles, I. A. (1964). Catalogue for the qualitative interpretation of the House-Tree-Person (H-T-P). Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.

  Google Scholar

• Kato, D. & Suzuki, M. (2015). Relationships between human figures drawn by Japanese early adolescents: Applying the Synthetic House-Tree-Person Test. Social Behavior and Personality, 43, 175–176.

  CrossRef  Google Scholar

• Koppitz, E. M. (1968). Psychological evaluation of children's Human Figure Drawings. New York: Grune & Stratton.

  Google Scholar

• Leibowitz, M. (1999). Interpreting Projective Drawings. New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis.

  Google Scholar

• Li, C., Chen, T., Helfrich, C., & Pan, A. (2011). The development of a scoring system for the kinetic house-tree-person drawing test. Hong Kong Journal of Occupational Therapy, 21, 72–79.

  CrossRef  Google Scholar

• Lopez, J. R., & Carolan, R. (2001). House-Tree-Person drawings and sex offenders: A pilot study. Art Therapy: Journal of the American Art Therapy Association, 18, 158–165.

  CrossRef  Google Scholar

• Louw, A. E., & Ramkisson, S. (2002). The suitability of the Roberts Apperception Test for Children (RATC), the House-Tree-Person (H-T-P) and Draw-A-Person (D-A-P) scales in the identification of child sexual abuse in the Indian community: An exploratory study. Southern African Journal of Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 14, 91–106.

  CrossRef  Google Scholar

• Machover, K. (1949). Personality projection in the drawing of the human figure. Springfield: Charles C. Thomas.

  CrossRef  Google Scholar

• Malchiodi, C. (1998). Understanding Children's Drawings. New York: Guilford.

  Google Scholar

• McNeilly, G., & Gilroy, A. (Eds.). (2000). The changing shape of art therapy: New developments in theory and practice. London: Jessica Kingsley.

  Google Scholar

• Mikami, N. (1995). The S-HTP Technique: The Clinical and Developmental Approach in Synthetic-H–T–P Test. Tokyo: Seishinshobo.

  Google Scholar

• Palmer, L., Farrar, A. R., Valle, M., Ghahary, N., et al. (2000). An investigation of the clinical use of the House-Tree-Person projective drawings in the psychological evaluation of child sexual abuse. Child Maltreatment, 5, 169–175.

  CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar

• Pelander, T., Lehtonen, K., & Leino-Kilpi, H. (2007). Children in the hospital: Elements of quality in drawings. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 22, 333–341.

  CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar

• Picard, D., & Lebaz, S. (2010). Symbolic use of size and color in freehand drawing of the tree: Myth or reality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 92, 186–188.

  CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar

• Safran, D. S. (2002). Art therapy and AD/HD: Diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. London: Jessica Kingsley.

  Google Scholar

• Sattler, J. M. (1988). Assessment of children (3rd ed.). San Diego: Jerome M. Sattler.

  Google Scholar

• Sherman, R., & Fredman, N. (1987). Handbook of measurements for marriage and family therapy. Philadelphia: Routledge.

  Google Scholar

• Silver, R. (1996). Silver drawing test of cognition and emotion. Sarasota: Ablin.

  Google Scholar

• Tharinger, D., & Stark, K. (1990). A qualitative versus quantitative approach to evaluating a Draw-A-Person and Kinetic Family Drawing: Study of mood- and anxiety-disordered children. Psychological Assessment: Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 2, 365–375.

  CrossRef  Google Scholar

• Van Hutton, V. (1994). House-Tree-Person and Draw-a-Person as measures of abuse in children: A quantitative scoring system. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources.

  Google Scholar

• Vass, Z. (1998). The inner formal structure of the H-T-P drawings: An exploratory study. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 54, 611–619.

  CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar

• West, M. M. (1998). Meta-analysis of studies assessing the efficacy of projective techniques in discriminating child sexual abuse. Child Abuse and Neglect, 22, 1151–1166.

  CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar

• White, C. R., Wallace, J., & Huffman, L. C. (2004). Use of drawings to identify thought impairment among students with emotional and behavioral disorders: An exploratory study. Art Therapy: Journal of the American Art Therapy Association, 21, 210–218.

  CrossRef  Google Scholar

• Yama, M. (1990). The usefulness of human figure drawings as an index of overall adjustment. Journal of Projective Techniques, 12, 202–215.

  Google Scholar

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

1. Rusk Rehabilitation, New York University Langone Health, 240 East 38th Street, New York, NY, 10016, USA

   Robert M. Gordon Dr.

2. One Neuro, West Los Angeles, California, USA

   Alexandra Rudd-Barnard Dr.

3. Rusk Rehabilitation, New York, NY, USA

   Lucia Smith-Wexler Dr.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert M. Gordon Dr. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

1. Richmond, Virgin Islands, USA

   Prof. Jeffrey Kreutzer

2. Kessler Foundation , West Orange, New Jersey, USA

   John DeLuca

3. Suite 200 , Wynnewood, Pennsylvania, USA

   Bruce Caplan

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG (outside the USA)

About this entry

Cite this entry

Gordon, R.M., Rudd-Barnard, A., Smith-Wexler, L. (2018). House-Tree-Person Test. In: Kreutzer, J., DeLuca, J., Caplan, B. (eds) Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56782-2_2029-3

Download citation

• .RIS
• .ENW
• .BIB

• DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56782-2_2029-3

• Received: 12 October 2015

• Accepted: 04 September 2017

• Published: 15 December 2017

• Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

• Print ISBN: 978-3-319-56782-2

• Online ISBN: 978-3-319-56782-2

• eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and Psychology Reference Module Humanities and Social Sciences

greensucher72.blogspot.com

Source: https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-56782-2_2029-3

Bagikan Artikel ini